Dyno-ed my B20 non-VTEC engine
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno-ed my B20 non-VTEC engine
This engine began as a stock B20B from an Orthia wagan. I daily and race with it for about 2 years and the engine held up fine. It has a Spoon flywheel, stock ITR clutch and 4.785FD with Kazz 1.5 clutch type LSD.
Then I began to collect parts for this engine, wanted to stay non-VTEC. I started with a set of new Crower 62405 first gen cams, but the amount of extra head work turned me away. Afterall, this car is still a daily and I have to stay realistic about it. So I got a BC0022 cams instead.
Engine was sent in for head work by Gord Bush, a local Honda guru that does great work. Then I wrapped up some more money and had the new head mated to the block and first, it was street tuned. Then about 2 month after, I dyno tuned it yesterday. Andrew, a local tuner did both the street and dyno tune.
Base run from street tune was 155/122 IIRC, then this is the end result:
Setup:
Stock B20 bottom
P8R head ported and valve work, mild version
Crower Ti valvetrain
Brian Crower 0022 cams
HKS cam gears set at -1 intake +3 exhaust
RS 68mm TB
Blox IM ported at TB and runner side
OEM B20 3 layer head gasket
OEM valve seals
RC 370cc injectors
ITR fuel pump (134lph)
ARC intake chamber mated with HKS mushroom (2 ply filter)
Maxim Works tri Y header (generic B series I believe)
CTR cat.
2.5" catback
Throttle open is only at 90%, I am not sure if it has to do with the actual TB or accelrator cable, because I am still using stock Y7 one, not Si/SiR one.
We did about 18 runs in close to 2 hours. We tried 0,0 and also +3/-3, but -1/+3 yield the best result. At one point, the motor dynoed 150/120 because of the cam gear setup.
We didn't adjust the cam gears beyond +3 or -3 degree, because I wasn't sure if the head was milled or just surfaced, so didn't want to risk it.
Overall, I am happy with the result. I road race and I had a lot of fun with just stock B20. With this new setup, hopefully 2008 season will be a more interesting one.
Comments and suggestions welcome. Thanks for reading guys.
Modified by Nova_Dust at 9:46 AM 5/6/2008
Modified by Nova_Dust at 9:48 AM 5/6/2008
Then I began to collect parts for this engine, wanted to stay non-VTEC. I started with a set of new Crower 62405 first gen cams, but the amount of extra head work turned me away. Afterall, this car is still a daily and I have to stay realistic about it. So I got a BC0022 cams instead.
Engine was sent in for head work by Gord Bush, a local Honda guru that does great work. Then I wrapped up some more money and had the new head mated to the block and first, it was street tuned. Then about 2 month after, I dyno tuned it yesterday. Andrew, a local tuner did both the street and dyno tune.
Base run from street tune was 155/122 IIRC, then this is the end result:
Setup:
Stock B20 bottom
P8R head ported and valve work, mild version
Crower Ti valvetrain
Brian Crower 0022 cams
HKS cam gears set at -1 intake +3 exhaust
RS 68mm TB
Blox IM ported at TB and runner side
OEM B20 3 layer head gasket
OEM valve seals
RC 370cc injectors
ITR fuel pump (134lph)
ARC intake chamber mated with HKS mushroom (2 ply filter)
Maxim Works tri Y header (generic B series I believe)
CTR cat.
2.5" catback
Throttle open is only at 90%, I am not sure if it has to do with the actual TB or accelrator cable, because I am still using stock Y7 one, not Si/SiR one.
We did about 18 runs in close to 2 hours. We tried 0,0 and also +3/-3, but -1/+3 yield the best result. At one point, the motor dynoed 150/120 because of the cam gear setup.
We didn't adjust the cam gears beyond +3 or -3 degree, because I wasn't sure if the head was milled or just surfaced, so didn't want to risk it.
Overall, I am happy with the result. I road race and I had a lot of fun with just stock B20. With this new setup, hopefully 2008 season will be a more interesting one.
Comments and suggestions welcome. Thanks for reading guys.
Modified by Nova_Dust at 9:46 AM 5/6/2008
Modified by Nova_Dust at 9:48 AM 5/6/2008
#5
Dos Pupusas
iTrader: (1)
Re: (mar778c)
Great numbers for sure. I bet that thing rips!! What chassis is it on?
As far as the bolt goes...
What size is it? 1/4 inch SAE? 6mm Metric?
If the treads are completely gone, try using a size bigger tap. If not try running a tap through the hole and see if you can clean it up. Hope this helps.
As far as the bolt goes...
What size is it? 1/4 inch SAE? 6mm Metric?
If the treads are completely gone, try using a size bigger tap. If not try running a tap through the hole and see if you can clean it up. Hope this helps.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (clean rice)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Solid #'s man! I'm assuming you're using a LS tranny? How does that with a 4.7FD compare to a B16/B18C transmission?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks. I am using JDM 98 spec tranny, stock 4.785 with Kazz. I believe 2nd and 3rd gear are GSR. 120km at 4100rpm or there about. But I am using 225/45/15 tires now, so rev is slightly different. But at any rate, it is hard to stay under 3000rpm.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tonio »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Great numbers for sure. I bet that thing rips!! What chassis is it on?
As far as the bolt goes...
What size is it? 1/4 inch SAE? 6mm Metric?
If the treads are completely gone, try using a size bigger tap. If not try running a tap through the hole and see if you can clean it up. Hope this helps.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks. I am using EK hatch chassis. Car without me is about 2200lbs, with half cage in it. I am more leaning towards cutting weight off of the car as oppose to increase the hp.
The bolts is metric I believe. The thread is not stripped, but the hex shape is more like rounded now. I guess you can still make it come loose if you try, but won't last very long. The cam gears are brand new and only did like 5 or 6 adjustments and it is slightly rounded
Thanks. I am using JDM 98 spec tranny, stock 4.785 with Kazz. I believe 2nd and 3rd gear are GSR. 120km at 4100rpm or there about. But I am using 225/45/15 tires now, so rev is slightly different. But at any rate, it is hard to stay under 3000rpm.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tonio »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Great numbers for sure. I bet that thing rips!! What chassis is it on?
As far as the bolt goes...
What size is it? 1/4 inch SAE? 6mm Metric?
If the treads are completely gone, try using a size bigger tap. If not try running a tap through the hole and see if you can clean it up. Hope this helps.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks. I am using EK hatch chassis. Car without me is about 2200lbs, with half cage in it. I am more leaning towards cutting weight off of the car as oppose to increase the hp.
The bolts is metric I believe. The thread is not stripped, but the hex shape is more like rounded now. I guess you can still make it come loose if you try, but won't last very long. The cam gears are brand new and only did like 5 or 6 adjustments and it is slightly rounded
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (flesh199)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by flesh199 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nova_Dust
this kind of air filter costed me 10whp/2wtq on my setup.If you can change it </TD></TR></TABLE>
What should I do? Open TB? No ARC chamber? Please enlighten me, thanks.
this kind of air filter costed me 10whp/2wtq on my setup.If you can change it </TD></TR></TABLE>
What should I do? Open TB? No ARC chamber? Please enlighten me, thanks.
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: T Dot
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Nova_Dust)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nova_Dust »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What should I do? Open TB? No ARC chamber? Please enlighten me, thanks. </TD></TR></TABLE>
tuned intake length w/v-stack. Gord Bush and Zman FTMFW. good numbers, Nova
What should I do? Open TB? No ARC chamber? Please enlighten me, thanks. </TD></TR></TABLE>
tuned intake length w/v-stack. Gord Bush and Zman FTMFW. good numbers, Nova
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Rollo Lawson)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rollo Lawson »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
tuned intake length w/v-stack. Gord Bush and Zman FTMFW. good numbers, Nova</TD></TR></TABLE>
Gord and Andrew, they know their stuff fo sho
So TB, 3" straight pipe, V-stack, and a cone filter setup? So the straight pipe length is the stricky factor? What would a shorter/longer pipe do?
tuned intake length w/v-stack. Gord Bush and Zman FTMFW. good numbers, Nova</TD></TR></TABLE>
Gord and Andrew, they know their stuff fo sho
So TB, 3" straight pipe, V-stack, and a cone filter setup? So the straight pipe length is the stricky factor? What would a shorter/longer pipe do?
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brampton, ON, Canada
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice numbers man!!
the tq seems kinda low... but it's different with every motor i guess.
gj for zman. nice to see another b20 around the area with some good power.
the tq seems kinda low... but it's different with every motor i guess.
gj for zman. nice to see another b20 around the area with some good power.
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did some readings on v-stack.
I suppose if the v-stack is mounted on a SRI, which is still under the hood so intake temperature will pretty much stays the same. Since I am not getting any more cold air than before therefore no increase in more oxygen. So I don't have to (technically) do another dyno tune to add more fuel.
Don't want to lean out on the track.
I will first play with different air filter on the track.
I suppose if the v-stack is mounted on a SRI, which is still under the hood so intake temperature will pretty much stays the same. Since I am not getting any more cold air than before therefore no increase in more oxygen. So I don't have to (technically) do another dyno tune to add more fuel.
Don't want to lean out on the track.
I will first play with different air filter on the track.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Where the wild things are in, NY, United States of America
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
this makes me feel much better about the b20 i just ordered.
looks like great numbers. must be fun to drive on around with torque and short gears.
looks like great numbers. must be fun to drive on around with torque and short gears.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ComeOnKip)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ComeOnKip »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">this makes me feel much better about the b20 i just ordered.
looks like great numbers. must be fun to drive on around with torque and short gears.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock B20 is a fairly reliable engine. The first mod for a B20 is short gear tranny, period. I mean, you can't use stock B20 tranny anyway so when you pair it up, it has to be some kind of B series tranny. I would say 4.785 ITR tranny is a really good choice, and use LSD when you can. I really wouldn't worry too much about the "fuel mileage" since you will be on 87 for a while until you do some work to it.
This engine has done me proud, from day one to today. Everyday is a fun day with this car.
looks like great numbers. must be fun to drive on around with torque and short gears.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock B20 is a fairly reliable engine. The first mod for a B20 is short gear tranny, period. I mean, you can't use stock B20 tranny anyway so when you pair it up, it has to be some kind of B series tranny. I would say 4.785 ITR tranny is a really good choice, and use LSD when you can. I really wouldn't worry too much about the "fuel mileage" since you will be on 87 for a while until you do some work to it.
This engine has done me proud, from day one to today. Everyday is a fun day with this car.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hamilton, ON, Canada
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ComeOnKip)
the 68mm throttle body doesn't help the torque much, and the Skunk2 intake manifold on the B20s is known to loose a little torque.
I would've liked to see a little more torque myself, but i think the results are pretty good. I really like how the power carries nicely to 7000-7500rpm, most b20s really start dying out at 5500-6000rpms.
This car is a fun street car and Charles (nova dust) will have lots of fun with this at the track events.
I would've liked to see a little more torque myself, but i think the results are pretty good. I really like how the power carries nicely to 7000-7500rpm, most b20s really start dying out at 5500-6000rpms.
This car is a fun street car and Charles (nova dust) will have lots of fun with this at the track events.
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: r4, mars
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seeing the s2 manifold.. etc and other parts used..
me thinks a slightly longer than a shortram intake (3in uniform dia.) with a v-stack+filter at the end.. myt help a few more ponies and or torque.. tune the length on the dyno def will be better..
all in all.. nice solid numbers! i bet overtaking cars on the freeway is such a breeze huh!
me thinks a slightly longer than a shortram intake (3in uniform dia.) with a v-stack+filter at the end.. myt help a few more ponies and or torque.. tune the length on the dyno def will be better..
all in all.. nice solid numbers! i bet overtaking cars on the freeway is such a breeze huh!
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (d15Beta)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by d15Beta »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">seeing the s2 manifold.. etc and other parts used..
me thinks a slightly longer than a shortram intake (3in uniform dia.) with a v-stack+filter at the end.. myt help a few more ponies and or torque.. tune the length on the dyno def will be better..
all in all.. nice solid numbers! i bet overtaking cars on the freeway is such a breeze huh!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks man. I will keep the v-stack option in mind for sure. A little side project for the rest of the year. Car moves at 5th gear on highway, most of the time it is around 4000rpm so the engine is almost always around the power band. Though I still like to stay behind the pack, no need to lead the pack and get caught by the police.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bombcat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice hp and torque numbers. looks like its a fun street car. also how do you like the cams?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks. I think these mild/stage 2 cams prove themselves worthy. Preserves decent mileage and idles fine. Though I don't mind rough idling myself, but for a first timer who went through his first engine build, I think this is a nice jump from stock engine. A little bit of performance increase is what I like and how I do things.
Next phase is either further weight reduction or more hp increase. I think I am leaning towards the first. But we will see.
me thinks a slightly longer than a shortram intake (3in uniform dia.) with a v-stack+filter at the end.. myt help a few more ponies and or torque.. tune the length on the dyno def will be better..
all in all.. nice solid numbers! i bet overtaking cars on the freeway is such a breeze huh!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks man. I will keep the v-stack option in mind for sure. A little side project for the rest of the year. Car moves at 5th gear on highway, most of the time it is around 4000rpm so the engine is almost always around the power band. Though I still like to stay behind the pack, no need to lead the pack and get caught by the police.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bombcat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice hp and torque numbers. looks like its a fun street car. also how do you like the cams?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks. I think these mild/stage 2 cams prove themselves worthy. Preserves decent mileage and idles fine. Though I don't mind rough idling myself, but for a first timer who went through his first engine build, I think this is a nice jump from stock engine. A little bit of performance increase is what I like and how I do things.
Next phase is either further weight reduction or more hp increase. I think I am leaning towards the first. But we will see.
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: r4, mars
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice! well i just based and asumed it may and could work for u... seeing ur rpm range is near exact to my sohc lol.. the longer intake def helped around 3-4k rpm and 7-8k <-- i think ur in that range too lol
#21
Honda-Tech Member
i like non vtec build for a DD but just to help out you should try running a high flow cat or test pipe there will be more hp unlocked for you and maybe a cold air would work best.
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brampton, ON, Canada
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (zman)
we dynoed 2 stock b20s with i/h/e. one with 2.25 exhaust put down 147whp and 145tq. and one with 2.5 exhaust put down 149.5whp and 142tq. power started dying after 6400.
but definitely love the fact that the power carries to 7 to 7.5 on a non vtec motor
but definitely love the fact that the power carries to 7 to 7.5 on a non vtec motor
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (bombcat)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bombcat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">do you think a ls with similar mods could put down 160whp? also i see your into circuit racing, have u taken it on the track since the build?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Displacement will play a little factor, same as P8R head since it has bigger intake valve than P75 head. But I would say everything else being the same, depending on temperature and where you dyno, maybe 155-160?
I haven't this year, since the build was done about 2 months ago but I will track it at least at two events, and one being 9am-5pm full day time attack. Beat on the engine I will, for sure.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIC_jdm_da9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i like non vtec build for a DD but just to help out you should try running a high flow cat or test pipe there will be more hp unlocked for you and maybe a cold air would work best.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I do have a test pipe ready and will most likely swap it out for track day then go back to cat after. I personally hate the smell of exhaust fume so I wouldn't want to pollute any further. Also, being a modified vehicle on street, last thing I want is get caught with no cat.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alphaq69 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">we dynoed 2 stock b20s with i/h/e. one with 2.25 exhaust put down 147whp and 145tq. and one with 2.5 exhaust put down 149.5whp and 142tq. power started dying after 6400.
but definitely love the fact that the power carries to 7 to 7.5 on a non vtec motor </TD></TR></TABLE>
I have a stock 2.25" catback setup and with that, car feels better at low end than top end. I would love to see 140+ wtq, but like Zman said, the Blox IM + 68mm TB probably didn't help as they might be more helpful for bigger cams. And with BC0022/62403 spec cams, they a probably undercammed for the IM and TB.
If possible, I might get 62404 cams and dyno that next year, since the valvetrain is ready for that anyway. Though I am not sure if ITR fuel pump is up for the job?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ComeOnKip »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm sure the ability to not choke up at the higher rpm ranges is due to the port work + slightly more aggy cam combo.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think so too, plus with 33mm intake valve, I think that helped a bit as well.
-----------
Thanks for the comments and suggestions guys.
Displacement will play a little factor, same as P8R head since it has bigger intake valve than P75 head. But I would say everything else being the same, depending on temperature and where you dyno, maybe 155-160?
I haven't this year, since the build was done about 2 months ago but I will track it at least at two events, and one being 9am-5pm full day time attack. Beat on the engine I will, for sure.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIC_jdm_da9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i like non vtec build for a DD but just to help out you should try running a high flow cat or test pipe there will be more hp unlocked for you and maybe a cold air would work best.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I do have a test pipe ready and will most likely swap it out for track day then go back to cat after. I personally hate the smell of exhaust fume so I wouldn't want to pollute any further. Also, being a modified vehicle on street, last thing I want is get caught with no cat.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alphaq69 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">we dynoed 2 stock b20s with i/h/e. one with 2.25 exhaust put down 147whp and 145tq. and one with 2.5 exhaust put down 149.5whp and 142tq. power started dying after 6400.
but definitely love the fact that the power carries to 7 to 7.5 on a non vtec motor </TD></TR></TABLE>
I have a stock 2.25" catback setup and with that, car feels better at low end than top end. I would love to see 140+ wtq, but like Zman said, the Blox IM + 68mm TB probably didn't help as they might be more helpful for bigger cams. And with BC0022/62403 spec cams, they a probably undercammed for the IM and TB.
If possible, I might get 62404 cams and dyno that next year, since the valvetrain is ready for that anyway. Though I am not sure if ITR fuel pump is up for the job?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ComeOnKip »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm sure the ability to not choke up at the higher rpm ranges is due to the port work + slightly more aggy cam combo.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think so too, plus with 33mm intake valve, I think that helped a bit as well.
-----------
Thanks for the comments and suggestions guys.
#25
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am also wondering why we didn't make power when we set the cam gears to +3/-3 but ended with some good results with -1/+3.
Was it because of lack of compression? Like stock piston shape with less peaky design?
Was it because of lack of compression? Like stock piston shape with less peaky design?