Print  Email  Subscribe  RSS  Help
 Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will winFirst  1 2 >  Last
Author Post

xiaogou




Offline

382 posts [100%]
Philadelphia PA
11-17-2004
  Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win« » Reply  Edit


Do you think it's an accident that McCain is laying low just letting Obama runoff with the mouth? They just need one good soundbite. Something like; I was for the war befor I was against it, or something like that.

Obama is in trouble with his camp. He is "refining" his position

I look forward to the attack ads.


http://arabist.net/archives/20...flops/

Ali Abunimah, the Palestinian-American whose work I greatly admire (and whose daily press round-up on Palestine, Iraq and the Middle East is a must-read), has written a great editorial on the implications for the Middle East that Bush’s victory has. While I encourage you to read the whole thing, one of the most interesting parts of the article is about Barack Obama, the new superstar of Democrat politics, and how he has (like so many others before him) abandoned a nuanced stance on the peace process to endorse the Israeli position:

Against this background, Bush has shifted the goal posts of the Palestine-Israel debate such that Likudist thinking is now viewed as centrist. This was demonstrated by Kerry’s campaign which warmly endorsed Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s policies. But the bankruptcy of the discourse was brought home in a most personally disappointing way.

Illinois swept Barack Obama, a rising star in the Democratic party, into the United States Senate with a stunning 70 percent of the vote - a rare Democratic gain. Obama, whom I’ve met many times, has served as my local state senator in the Illinois legislature. I found him to be an inspiring politician, not least because he appeared to understand Middle East issues and take progressive views supporting Palestinian rights and opposing militarism. He participated in many events in the Chicago-area Arab community including a 1998 fundraiser with Edward Said as the keynote speaker. I even made contributions to his campaigns.

But following Obama’s nationally-televised address at the Democratic National Convention everything seemed to change. In the campaign’s final weeks, Obama proclaimed his support for tough sanctions and military strikes against Iran if it refused U.S. demands to give up its nuclear programs. According to the Chicago Tribune, Obama now says that the onus of peace in the Middle East “is on the Palestinian leadership, which … must cease violence against Israelis and work ‘to end the incitement against Israel in the Arab world.” The unique fact about Obama’s campaign is that he did not need to parrot the pro-Israel lobby’s standard line to get elected. He ran effectively unopposed. Such a capable and ambitious man must have calculated that any hope of higher office requires that he not offend when it comes to Israel and its interests. This begs the question: If a man like Obama will not speak frankly when it comes to Israel, what hope is there for a change in U.S. policy coming from within the establishment?

As they say in right-wing blogs, indeed.

*********************************

Wow, so Obama used to do a lot to support Palestinian causes. What happened? Edward Said did a lot in his life to help the Palestinian cause.




Vigilantibus non dormientibus aequitas subvenit.



Ross
H-T White Ops



Offline

16585 posts [101%]
Can Moderate All Forums
4-19-2001
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (xiaogou)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by xiaogou »

Wow, so Obama used to do a lot to support Palestinian causes. What happened? Edward Said did a lot in his life to help the Palestinian cause.

Moving toward the Likud's position is something that any serious presidential candidate is going to have to do, unless he wants to be painted in a very unsavory light.



ITR Theft Broke My Heart

Superhatch




Offline

3114 posts [100%]
Straight Edge
5-22-2001
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (Ross)« » Reply  Edit


Until a president is elected, and he is from a major party, I take the words coming out of his mouth as half truths. For some reason in this country, if you are neutral to Israel, you are not an American patriot. So I would wager that Obama is hedging his bets on the side of Israel to start with and will over his 4 years adapt his position to one of a mediator.

At least, that's what I am hoping for.




"The truth [the truth?] is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on [settled on?] the one issue that everone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction, as the core reason." Paul Wolfowitz

tjbizzo




Offline

2682 posts [100%]
District of Columbia, the National Crook Capital
9-24-2003
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (xiaogou)« » Reply  Edit


First, you do realize that you are linking to a 4 year old article, right? Looks like you guys are really having to dig hard to try and find something to use against Obama, eh? hehe

Second, what, exactly, is the "flip-flop" here? Obama supported, and still supports, Palestinian rights, i.e. to not be the victims of violence by Israelis against them. He also expects that the Palestinians should do their part in the peace process by working to end violent attacks against Israelis. I can see nothing inconsistent or mutually exclusive either within or between those two goals. If you do then please explain it to the rest of us. And no, just saying "he flip-flops" doesn't make it true.





Quote, originally posted by Knightsport »
Idiocy needs food to thrive and attention is its delicacy.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis

RonPaul2008!!!


hu




Offline

4330 posts [98%]
McCain Palin 2008
7-13-2005
 « « » Reply  Edit


Imagine what the RNC will throw at O. I have a feeling this will be one of the natiest elections in awhile.



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)

turboteener




Offline

1719 posts [100%]
AL
11-5-2002
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (tjbizzo)« » Reply  Edit


Perhaps this article is a little more current. Although it isn't just limited to Obama, McCain is in this too.:
Quote »

US candidates practise their U-turns

By Max Deveson
BBC News, Washington

In order to pass their political driving test, successful politicians need to be masters of one tricky manoeuvre in particular - the U-turn.

Barack Obama (L) and John McCain (R), both pictured from behind
The candidates have shifted their positions on a number of policies

The contenders in this year's US presidential election are no exceptions - both John McCain and Barack Obama have engaged in some nifty repositioning.

Mr McCain's U-turns have mostly increased his appeal to the Republican Party's base, placing him on a rightward trajectory.

Barack Obama has been performing a more traditional manoeuvre: running to the left during the primaries, when party activists need to be wooed, then shifting to the centre once the nomination is clinched.

Flip-flopping politicians will always attract charges of hypocrisy and opportunism: it may be worth it if it helps them win over undecided voters in the middle, but when the goal is to shore up their political base, the benefits are much less clear.

Here are some examples.

JOHN MCCAIN

Having long been a member of his party's more moderate wing on a number of issues, Mr McCain began adopting more right-wing positions during the primary campaign.

Immigration

Last year, Mr McCain was one of the key backers of President Bush's plan for "comprehensive immigration reform", which would have created "paths to citizenship" for illegal immigrants, while investing more money in border security.

The plan was very unpopular with the Republican rank-and-file, and Senate Republicans succeeded in blocking the scheme.

During the primaries, Mr McCain announced that his immigration focus would be on securing America's borders, rather than on giving illegal immigrants the chance to become US citizens.

"I understand why you would call it a, quote, shift," McCain told reporters in November 2007.

"I say it is a lesson learned about what the American people's priorities are. And their priority is to secure the borders."

Christian right

Another McCain, quote, shift was in his relationship with the religious right of his party.

During his 2000 bid for the Republican nomination, relations between Mr McCain and Christian Coalition founder Jerry Falwell were notoriously fractious.

The Arizona senator memorably described Mr Falwell and fellow members of the religious right as "agents of intolerance".

But in 2006, ahead of his second presidential run, Mr McCain delivered the commencement address at Mr Falwell's Liberty University, after which he attended a small private party hosted by his former political adversary.

Interrogation rules

More recently, Mr McCain angered his former allies in the political centre by supporting a bill exempting the CIA from following the same rules on interrogation as the US Army.

Guantanamo

Mr McCain was one of the most prominent Republican voices opposed to the Bush administration's detention policy in Guantanamo Bay.

But when the Supreme Court recently ruled that Guantanamo detainees should have access to US courts, Mr McCain described it as "one of the worst decisions in the history of the country".

Oil drilling

Since sewing up the Republican nomination in March, Mr McCain - one of only a few prominent Republicans to accept the argument that human activity is causing climate change - has dropped his previous objection to lifting the ban on oil exploration off the coast of the US.

BARACK OBAMA

Since clinching the Democratic nomination, Barack Obama has also been making headlines for his policy shifts.

Campaign finance

Last month he announced that he would be rejecting public financing for his campaign, and would instead rely on private donations.

The McCain camp accused Mr Obama of "going back on his word", although Mr Obama insisted that he had never made a promise to stay in the public finance system.

Surveillance programme

Mr Obama also raised eyebrows when he announced that he would not be opposing a bill going through Congress giving immunity to telephone companies involved in the Bush administration's controversial warrantless wiretap programme.

His decision angered many of his supporters on the left, who accused him of going back on his 2007 pledge "to support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies".

Gun control

When the Supreme Court decided to overturn Washington DC's handgun ban, Mr Obama declared that the ruling "provide[d] much-needed guidance", despite having previously argued (in a written answer that he says was drafted by an aide and which he had not approved) that the ban was constitutional.

Iraq

Withdrawing troops from Iraq has long been one of the central planks of Mr Obama's campaign, and was something that set him apart from other Democratic candidates running for the party's presidential nomination.

Since his campaign began, however, conditions in Iraq have changed, violence has reduced, and some commentators have suggested that Mr Obama's position is out of date.

Mr Obama himself has announced that he plans to visit Iraq, where he will make "a thorough assessment" which could lead him to "refine" his policy.

Some critics have seized on this as an indication that Mr Obama is laying the groundwork for a change in position.

Free trade

Mr Obama recently hinted to Fortune magazine that his strong anti-free trade rhetoric during the primaries may not be reflected in his actual trade policy should he become president.

His remarks are a neat summation of the pressures and temptations that lead politicians to shift their positions during the process of running for office.

"Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified," he said.

"Politicians are always guilty of that, and I don't exempt myself."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7474558.stm



http://www.smracingdevelopment.com

Knightsport
Fabled creature.



Offline

27223 posts [101%]
Arlington TX
10-30-2001


My Gallery
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (turboteener)« » Reply  Edit


The Israeli lobby is powerful.

We need to overhaul lobbying altogether.

This unwavering support for Israel is a bit worrisome.



"I haven't failed. I've identified 10,000 ways this doesn’t work." -Thomas Edison

“There are two ways to live: you can live as if nothing is a miracle; you can live as if everything is a miracle.” -Albert Einstein


xiaogou




Offline

382 posts [100%]
Philadelphia PA
11-17-2004
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (Knightsport)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by Knightsport »
The Israeli lobby is powerful.

We need to overhaul lobbying altogether.

This unwavering support for Israel is a bit worrisome.

Why? They are our only true ally in the whole region. The only one we can really count on.



Vigilantibus non dormientibus aequitas subvenit.

Knightsport
Fabled creature.



Offline

27223 posts [101%]
Arlington TX
10-30-2001


My Gallery
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (xiaogou)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by xiaogou »

Why? They are our only true ally in the whole region. The only one we can really count on.

Count on for what exactly?



"I haven't failed. I've identified 10,000 ways this doesn’t work." -Thomas Edison

“There are two ways to live: you can live as if nothing is a miracle; you can live as if everything is a miracle.” -Albert Einstein


electric-boost




Offline

792 posts [98%]
cincinnati ohio
12-22-2002
 « « » Reply  Edit


Unless obama is caught with crack and a dead whore I dont see him losing! I'm more conservative but think mccain is a tool bag also, watching him speak isn't quite as bad as watching bush though. RON PAUL!!!



honda-tech class of 2002
"It sounds like a bunch of garbage men playing cards"

"what in the hell kind of sound is that? you're gonna need to describe your sounds better, man. relate the sound to something i've actually heard before. i've heard a lot of things, but numerous monkeys playing cymbols isn't one of them."

EM1 Crew


Mark sans




Offline

1921 posts [101%]
a pig that dont fly straight
8-22-2001
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (Knightsport)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by Knightsport »

Count on for what exactly?


Spying on us? Taking our money?



"[G]reed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind." - GG

tjbizzo




Offline

2682 posts [100%]
District of Columbia, the National Crook Capital
9-24-2003
 « Re: (electric-boost)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by electric-boost »
Unless obama is caught with crack and a dead whore I dont see him losing! I'm more conservative but think mccain is a tool bag also, watching him speak isn't quite as bad as watching bush though. RON PAUL!!!

Yes, yes, yes, and YES!!!


Quote, originally posted by Mark sans »
Spying on us? Taking our money?

You left out "starting wars that we will fight for them".





Quote, originally posted by Knightsport »
Idiocy needs food to thrive and attention is its delicacy.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis

RonPaul2008!!!


rochesterricer




Offline

6949 posts [100%]
Rochester MN
4-5-2004
 « Re: Obama's flip-flops: Why McCain will win (xiaogou)« » Reply  Edit


Do we seriously need to link to the 5497619196196 youtube videos of McCain doublespeak?




"It is curious that physical courage should be so common in the world, and moral courage so rare."
--- Mark Twain

"Everything in the world may be endured except continued prosperity."
--- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


hu




Offline

4330 posts [98%]
McCain Palin 2008
7-13-2005
 « Re: (electric-boost)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by electric-boost »
Unless obama is caught with crack and a dead whore I dont see him losing! I'm more conservative but think mccain is a tool bag also, watching him speak isn't quite as bad as watching bush though. RON PAUL!!!

I see Obama moving to the center where McCain already is. Soon there wont be a difference between the two.

I look forward to Obama refining some more of his remarks

That 29% of Hillary supporters that said they wouldn't support Obama if he got the nod wern't bullshitting pollsters. I count them as the racist democrats who wont tolerate a black candidate come hell or high water. I bet anything McCain wins Pennsylvania, Kentucky, WV. McCain will win all of those states that Hillary won. Remember, you saw it here first!



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)

.Kevin.




Offline

2169 posts [98%]
Land on Lincoln
12-13-2004
 « Re: (hu)« » Reply  Edit


No, McCain is also flip flopping and out right lying to the public. I think Obama has changed some of his views, but he acknowledges them and how he came to that conclusion. In a presidential run there will always be runners that flip flop what they say.



-00 s2000
-97 Saturn SL1

Captured by
-Canon S2

///http://www.goyk.com/text.asp?id=135///

Xbox gametag- b00ked2themax


tjbizzo




Offline

2682 posts [100%]
District of Columbia, the National Crook Capital
9-24-2003
 « Re: (hu)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by hu »
I see Obama moving to the center where McCain already is. Soon there wont be a difference between the two.
McCain is in the center? LMAO! On WHAT, exactly?

Quote, originally posted by hu »
I look forward to Obama refining some more of his remarks
I look forward to McCain opening his mouth about ANYTHING, especially while trying to read a teleprompter. The more people get to know the real John McSame, the better Obama will do.

Quote, originally posted by hu »
That 29% of Hillary supporters that said they wouldn't support Obama if he got the nod wern't bullshitting pollsters. I count them as the racist democrats who wont tolerate a black candidate come hell or high water.
a) you might want to check some of the more recent polling on that. b) yes, those racist Democrats should vote with the party they really belong to, the Republicans.

Quote, originally posted by hu »
I bet anything McCain wins Pennsylvania, Kentucky, WV. McCain will win all of those states that Hillary won. Remember, you saw it here first!
Oh, he'll definitely win KY and WV, but do you honestly think he'll win NY, CA, MA, and NJ!? You would have to be completely insane to believe that, and I don't think you that crazy, so that means you are a ... <insert pejorative term here>?





Quote, originally posted by Knightsport »
Idiocy needs food to thrive and attention is its delicacy.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis

RonPaul2008!!!


hu




Offline

4330 posts [98%]
McCain Palin 2008
7-13-2005
 « Re: (tjbizzo)« » Reply  Edit


McCain will win Florida and Texas and Colorado. Im sure you know this is the first time in a long time the Demons I mean Democrats are having their convention west of the ole Mississippi river. They need the West.

McCain will probably win Ohio as well- not sure on this one though. McCain will win most of the West and mid-west. When he picks Bloomberg he will be in a good position to win NY . McCain doesn't need to pander to the right wing. What? You think they [conservative right wing] are gonna vote for Obama or something? hahahahahahhahahahahahahahaha.

And no- those racist people are registered democrats who find themselves in a quandry because they've never voted for a republican in their lives before.

*****

Hey- lets place a bet on the election. Think of something good and IM me. Within reason, I will make a bet that McCain will win the election. He has too much going in his favor.



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)

rochesterricer




Offline

6949 posts [100%]
Rochester MN
4-5-2004
 « Re: (hu)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by hu »
You think they [conservative right wing] are gonna vote for Obama or something? hahahahahahhahahahahahahahaha.

.

No, but most of them are so underwhelmed by McCain that they may just stay home on voting day. Democrats, on the other hand, are very excited about Obama, and should turn out in droves. Even more so if Hilary is VP. Democratic primaries had massive turnouts all over the nation.




"It is curious that physical courage should be so common in the world, and moral courage so rare."
--- Mark Twain

"Everything in the world may be endured except continued prosperity."
--- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


hu




Offline

4330 posts [98%]
McCain Palin 2008
7-13-2005
 « Re: (rochesterricer)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by rochesterricer »

No, but most of them are so underwhelmed by McCain that they may just stay home on voting day. Democrats, on the other hand, are very excited about Obama, and should turn out in droves. Even more so if Hilary is VP. Democratic primaries had massive turnouts all over the nation.

Hillary wont be the VP. She did too much damage to him.

No conservative will sit this one out. Trust me. Right wing people feel forced this time around regardless if they like it or not. I have several friends that I have disassociated myself with as they are to the right of me if you can believe such a thing. None of them liked McCain. Take it to the bank when I tell you that they will all be the first ones in line on voting day to cast their votes for McCain. The right wing in this country will get behind McCain like the Apostles behind Jesus. Out of of fear of the alternative.

You make a good point about the excitement behind Obama. But- these are the same ones who always get excited . It could be Dukakis and it would be the same reaction.



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)

Mark sans




Offline

1921 posts [101%]
a pig that dont fly straight
8-22-2001
 « Re: (hu)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by hu »
...
The right wing in this country will get behind McCain like the Apostles behind Jesus. Out of of fear of the alternative.
...

Um, I don't know how much you thought about your metaphor, but hu, okay

I think the Rapture Right will abandon McCain, but I'm not sure it will matter, given the states they predominantely hail from. As for the swing states, the polls to date have been mixed and I don't think I've seen more than a handful of results that have beat the margin of error.



"[G]reed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind." - GG

hu




Offline

4330 posts [98%]
McCain Palin 2008
7-13-2005
 « Re: (Mark sans)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by Mark sans »

Um, I don't know how much you thought about your metaphor, but hu, okay

I think the Rapture Right will abandon McCain, but I'm not sure it will matter, given the states they predominantely hail from. As for the swing states, the polls to date have been mixed and I don't think I've seen more than a handful of results that have beat the margin of error.

Hmmm. That is a pretty good explanation that I can't argue with at the moment. Except for the abandonment of McCain.



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)

electric-boost




Offline

792 posts [98%]
cincinnati ohio
12-22-2002
 « « » Reply  Edit


I'm really tired of the whole "racist republicans" thing. Someone explain to me what if anything the democratic party has done for african americans to earn their unwaivering support. The answer is nothing!



honda-tech class of 2002
"It sounds like a bunch of garbage men playing cards"

"what in the hell kind of sound is that? you're gonna need to describe your sounds better, man. relate the sound to something i've actually heard before. i've heard a lot of things, but numerous monkeys playing cymbols isn't one of them."

EM1 Crew


njn63




Online

3297 posts [100%]
Gurnee IL
2-11-2003
 « Re: (electric-boost)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by electric-boost »
I'm really tired of the whole "racist republicans" thing. Someone explain to me what if anything the democratic party has done for african americans to earn their unwaivering support. The answer is nothing!

Actually elect one?

I'm still trying to figure out what McCain's strategy is to be honest. I think xiaogou might actually be right that McCain is laying low and hoping for a screw up.



1991 CRX HF- 46+ mpg beater
2000 S2000 Hardtop

myspace.com/nicknelson


Ross
H-T White Ops



Offline

16585 posts [101%]
Can Moderate All Forums
4-19-2001
 « Re: (njn63)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by njn63 »

Actually elect one?

I'm still trying to figure out what McCain's strategy is to be honest. I think xiaogou might actually be right that McCain is laying low and hoping for a screw up.

Well, McCain's operation is in big trouble. There's been a staff shake-up (big red flag, Obama hasn't had any of these), money isn't pouring in the way it's supposed to, and even little things like scheduling speeches so they will make the news cycle are being bungled.

The McCain operation has been too out-of-touch and slow to react to things like his comments about the economy, his lobbyist connections, etc...they wait until the public outcry reaches its zenith, then they do something like firing all the lobbyists.

If he's lying low and hoping for anything, it's a terrorist attack or an Israeli strike on Iran.



ITR Theft Broke My Heart

xiaogou




Offline

382 posts [100%]
Philadelphia PA
11-17-2004
 « Re: (Ross)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by Ross »

If he's lying low and hoping for anything, it's a terrorist attack or an Israeli strike on Iran.

Which would benefit him over Obama. I found out that McCain has hired the same person who set up Kerry for that "I was against the war before I was before I was against it" ordeal. A professor at OSU explained how that was a well orchestrated town-hall to get some sort of screwed up soundbite from Kerry which worked. Apparently, this same guy is working on behalf of the McCain camp.

Notice how when McCain was down in S. America, Obama went on a speaking binge? It was no accident. The McCain camp is hoping for a screw up, but attorneys usually choose their words- so it will be tough with Obama.

Hey Ross- are you clinging to your gun and your religion? J/k



Vigilantibus non dormientibus aequitas subvenit.
   First  1 2 >  Last


» Return to Politics
Forum Jump
Quick Reply

Powered by ZeroForum 2.1.2b. ©2008 RelyNet, Inc.