Print  Email  Subscribe  RSS  Help
 3piece front not legal for SFWDFirst  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last
Author Post

cluelessmale




Offline

1115 posts [100%]
PA
2-18-2003
  3piece front not legal for SFWD, but TS?« » Reply  Edit


http://www.nhrasportcompact.co...id=11

The NHRA Sport Compact Tech Committee will not approve this front end for use in the Urbanracer.com Sport FWD Class.

Per the recent rule revision posted for the Urbanracer.com Sport FWD class, “Based upon advanced written approval by NHRA, mild customizing and body kits permitted, but must retain full-bodied appearance. Minimum two functional doors required.”

Modified by cluelessmale at 1:28 PM 1/14/2008



95 DC2 (Racecar) 11.889 -- 120.00mph 10psi (9s by 2010)
94 DC4 (Daily)

Myspace




TheWickedOne




Offline

880 posts [97%]
CT
1-27-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale)« » Reply  Edit


Thats a bummer



•TurboStreet• 2007
9.70@156.81

RLZENGINEering

thefizix.com


rip94delsol




Offline

1267 posts [100%]
clutchless shifting through the streets of cali
1-15-2006
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by cluelessmale »
mild customizing and body kits permitted, but must retain full-bodied appearance. Minimum two functional doors required.”


For some reason I kinda of thought this would happen.

Just another "RULE" that is useless. IMHO




http://laskeyracing.com
http://camp1320.com
http://www.l-con.net


RIP Earl, Thanks for all your help and advice you wont be forgotten!


turbotypeR@SPEC




Offline

2544 posts [100%]
Alabaster Al
8-15-2000
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale)« » Reply  Edit


that's a shame. i would like to have it just to keep some rubber off the car.lol



10.12@154mph
big thanks to my sponsors: SPEC Clutch, MFactory, Avid Racing, Bullseye Power


rota92




Offline

6743 posts [100%]
On Vacation in Canadaland
6-27-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (rip94delsol)« » Reply  Edit


They are trying to keep the 'stock' car in stock car I would imagine. Unlike ahem...well stock car lol



http://www.internetbrands.com/ib

800-692-2200


SIXTYdashONE
Don Ronaldo



Offline

16192 posts [100%]
n00 Jersey
6-9-2002
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (TheWickedOne)« » Reply  Edit


thats gay... those are kickass



10.57@141mph in 2003

13 Second Daily Fun




rota92




Offline

6743 posts [100%]
On Vacation in Canadaland
6-27-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (turbotypeR@SPEC)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC »
that's a shame. i would like to have it just to keep some rubber off the car.lol

Mold a rear cover piece into the stock fender (or fiberglass ones) to block the rubber, I've seen it somewhere some years back



http://www.internetbrands.com/ib

800-692-2200


cluelessmale




Offline

1115 posts [100%]
PA
2-18-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (rota92)« » Reply  Edit


one less thing you need to have to be able to keep up with the big dogs



95 DC2 (Racecar) 11.889 -- 120.00mph 10psi (9s by 2010)
94 DC4 (Daily)

Myspace


Jeff @ Tempest
Honda-Tech Sponsor



Offline

13643 posts [100%]
Tempest MD
7-10-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by cluelessmale »
one less thing you need to have to be able to keep up with the big dogs

I wouldn't say that you would need this to keep up with anyone. I don't see any performance gain from this front end other than weight, but as long as there is weight minimums, that doesn't matter either.

Just another stupid NHRA rule, It would have been cool to have this.



Tempest Racing Online Store

Tempest Racing Home Page


Drag Race Inc




Offline

907 posts [100%]
Colorado Springs CO
9-7-2004
 « « » Reply  Edit


I don't understand what doesn't make it legal. It is two fenders, a hood, and a front bumper which is what all sportsman cars have. Just because the front fenders are flaired, what is the big deal?



Chris Dye
Club RSX.com
Drag Race Inc.com

miller
Honda-Tech Sponsor

Offline

10325 posts [100%]
long island ny
12-8-2001
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale)« » Reply  Edit


Thats bullshit, i dont understand why they will not allow this "body kit". If they dont allow these fenders and bumper then they should just make it mandatory to run stock fenders and bumper.



NRG tech racing inc
99a Bell St.
West Babylon NY 11704

631-243-6NRG

Miller@NRGtechracing.com

please visit our new online store.. http://www.NRGtechParts.com
http://www.NRGtechRacing.com


Arturbo
Better with Steak. resident wiseacre



Offline

21297 posts [100%]
1-26-2000


My Gallery
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (miller)« » Reply  Edit


I know some people that got that front end and they are pissed now!!



10.006@150mph T1 Race Development -Competition Clutch -Full-Race Motorsports
"You must be the change you want to see in the world"-Mahatma Gandhi



RacerStev




Offline

900 posts [100%]
Elkinspark pa
1-29-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (BoostedJeff)« » Reply  Edit


An exposed tire creates shitloads of drag. From what I've read anyway....



Steve
If no IM reply try RacerStev@Yahoo.com

96 Neon Power Street for 08



philipwight
race-lines.com



Offline

599 posts [100%]
Fort Worth Tx.
7-7-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (RacerStev)« » Reply  Edit


this is an email from Pat at nhra tech dept just after the vegas race. i have purchased one and that was about the only thing that was keeping me from racing. i didnt make the indy race becasue of home purchase but was planning on it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>there is a commercially available front bumper and fender combo available
>for the 1992-1995 Honda Civic. I just wanted to make sure that the set up
>is legal for competition in sfwd. The civics do not have the same amount
>of
>room in front of the core support as an integra or even a 1996-2000 civic.
>attached is a picture of the bumper and fenders on a car. it retaines the
>factory apearing fenders just wider. The rule book is vauge and i dont
>want
>to travel to indy and not be able to race.
>
>Thanks for your time,
>Philip Wight
>
Philip,
>
> Per the 2007 NHRA Sport Compact Rulebook page 31 under body it reads in
>part "Mild customizing and body kits permitted, but must retain full bodied
>appearance". With that said it would be legal to use the same fenders and
>bumper as this car; as it was permitted to run this past weekend in Las
>Vegas.
>
>Pat Cvengros
>
>Technical Services Representative
>
>(626) 250-2295

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Wight [mailto:philipwight@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:13 PM
To: Pat Cvengros
Subject: [Spam?] RE: [Spam?] sfwd bumper and fender question about legality.


Is this considered written permission?

Thanks alot.
Philip


Philip,

Not exactly, if you want written permission send pictures of the fenders and
bumper on your car, request approval. However I can tell you I see no problem
with the car you are using as an example.

Pat Cvengros

Technical Services Representative

(626) 250-2295




http://www.t1racedevelopment.com


miller
Honda-Tech Sponsor

Offline

10325 posts [100%]
long island ny
12-8-2001
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (philipwight)« » Reply  Edit


so wtf?



NRG tech racing inc
99a Bell St.
West Babylon NY 11704

631-243-6NRG

Miller@NRGtechracing.com

please visit our new online store.. http://www.NRGtechParts.com
http://www.NRGtechRacing.com


philipwight
race-lines.com



Offline

599 posts [100%]
Fort Worth Tx.
7-7-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (philipwight)« » Reply  Edit


i dont know why it pisses me off but it does. i guess because i went through the trouble of emailing before the investment.

with the way my i/c is mounted, that is the only bumper i have found to fit it. i guess we will see what looks better front end wise. i will have to dust off the chain saw.



http://www.t1racedevelopment.com


ls1_datsun




Offline

138 posts [100%]
phoenix az
7-25-2007
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (BoostedJeff)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by BoostedJeff »

I wouldn't say that you would need this to keep up with anyone. I don't see any performance gain from this front end other than weight, but as long as there is weight minimums, that doesn't matter either.

Just another stupid NHRA rule, It would have been cool to have this.

i hope your not serious...

with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference.


fast2camciv




Offline

1160 posts [100%]
Nampa Idaho
1-29-2003
 « « » Reply  Edit


so technically you could bolt on a set of fender flares and be ok? isnt that the same thing? seems like a rediculous rule.



94 Integra GSR 4dr 11.1 @ 130 490whp
Tunerzine.com Feature HERE!!

GSR VictorX, 1000cc's, P28, ITR cam FOR SALE HERE!!


TheWickedOne




Offline

880 posts [97%]
CT
1-27-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (ls1_datsun)« » Reply  Edit



Quote, originally posted by BoostedJeff »
Quote, originally posted by BoostedJeff »
I wouldn't say that you would need this to keep up with anyone. I don't see any performance gain from this front end other than weight, but as long as there is weight minimums, that doesn't matter either.

Just another stupid NHRA rule, It would have been cool to have this.



Quote, originally posted by ls1_datsun »

i hope your not serious...

with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference.

x2



•TurboStreet• 2007
9.70@156.81

RLZENGINEering

thefizix.com


Arturbo
Better with Steak. resident wiseacre



Offline

21297 posts [100%]
1-26-2000


My Gallery
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (ls1_datsun)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by ls1_datsun »

i hope your not serious...

with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference.


how so?



10.006@150mph T1 Race Development -Competition Clutch -Full-Race Motorsports
"You must be the change you want to see in the world"-Mahatma Gandhi



Boner_Ben




Online

1897 posts [99%]
Reisterstown MD
9-12-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (ls1_datsun)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by ls1_datsun »

i hope your not serious...

with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference.


Last time I checked the cars going 155+ are using stock body parts. I personally dont think a front end like that will make a difference but it is definitly neat looking. Looks to me like you pretty much have nhra's approval



94 Civic Hatch Bullseye S366XL/Tempest Tuned
10.34@145 so far.. -DOT tires/Nopi Powerstreet Trim
08 GSXR 750, 02 SVT Lightning
Absolute Pro-Formance 410-861-8606

1992Si




Offline

2266 posts [100%]
Somers CT
8-22-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (Arturbo)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by Arturbo »

how so?

IMO, with the slicks covered, the car will have better aero-dynamic's, less drag. With out the two holes (where the charge pipes are) again you have less drag.

Doesn't less drag = more speed?





Earl, thanks for all you did for us, "all of us". You'll live on in our memories. No one could ever replace you. RIP


AFAP Racing
1992 Yellow Civic Si best ET 9.85 @ 145.68MPH single cam, 1.54 60ft


TheWickedOne




Offline

880 posts [97%]
CT
1-27-2003
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (1992Si)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by 1992Si »

IMO, with the slicks covered, the car will have better aero-dynamic's, less drag. With out the two holes (where the charge pipes are) again you have less drag.

Doesn't less drag = more speed?

Looks as if the front bottom lip would benefit as well .. Of course, how do you quantify the gain in the aerodynamics, as well a little bit of downforce on the front.. Back to Back wind tunnel tests, slightly cut OEM vs the aftermarket.., it does look pretty dope though and theoretically.. there should be some type of gain.. I just can't say how much ..

Modified by TheWickedOne at 8:44 AM 8/24/2007



•TurboStreet• 2007
9.70@156.81

RLZENGINEering

thefizix.com


ATYPR




Offline

3603 posts [99%]
NC
5-8-2001
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (TheWickedOne)« » Reply  Edit


This front end is much safer than stock.

@#%* the rules, I'm buying this front end for my street car.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vAH3AeFy0SY

"Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest."
-Mark Twain

Ron Paul 08



tony1




Offline

12310 posts [101%]
Dallas TX
5-24-2002
 « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (TheWickedOne)« » Reply  Edit


If any of you guys have actually looked at one of these cars with the right offset wheel at high speeds, you'll see that the tires don't stick out past the fenders. The tires grow and get skinny, at the speeds where aero comes into play, the tires are not sticking out past the fenders.

This front end looks cool, no doubt, but it will more than likely slow the car down by having more frontal area that is not needed...

Wider is not better for aero.



http://www.t1raceparts.com

9.19 @ 164
9.27 @ 167


   First  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last


» Return to Drag Racing
Forum Jump
Quick Reply

Powered by ZeroForum 2.1.2b. ©2008 RelyNet, Inc.