|
TheWickedOne

Offline
880 posts [97%]
CT
1-27-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale) | « » 9:53 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
Thats a bummer
•TurboStreet• 2007 9.70@156.81RLZENGINEering thefizix.com
|
rip94delsol

Offline
1267 posts [100%]
clutchless shifting through the streets of cali
1-15-2006
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale) | « » 9:55 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by cluelessmale » | | mild customizing and body kits permitted, but must retain full-bodied appearance. Minimum two functional doors required.” |
For some reason I kinda of thought this would happen.
Just another "RULE" that is useless. IMHO
http://laskeyracing.com http://camp1320.com http://www.l-con.net RIP Earl, Thanks for all your help and advice you wont be forgotten!
|
turbotypeR@SPEC

Offline
2544 posts [100%]
Alabaster Al
8-15-2000
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale) | « » 9:55 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
that's a shame. i would like to have it just to keep some rubber off the car.lol
10.12@154mph big thanks to my sponsors: SPEC Clutch, MFactory, Avid Racing, Bullseye Power
|
rota92

Offline
6743 posts [100%]
On Vacation in Canadaland
6-27-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (rip94delsol) | « » 9:55 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
They are trying to keep the 'stock' car in stock car I would imagine. Unlike ahem...well stock car lol
http://www.internetbrands.com/ib800-692-2200
|
SIXTYdashONE
Don Ronaldo

Offline
16192 posts [100%]
n00 Jersey
6-9-2002
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (TheWickedOne) | « » 10:01 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
thats gay... those are kickass
10.57@141mph in 2003 13 Second Daily Fun
|
rota92

Offline
6743 posts [100%]
On Vacation in Canadaland
6-27-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (turbotypeR@SPEC) | « » 10:04 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC » | | that's a shame. i would like to have it just to keep some rubber off the car.lol |
Mold a rear cover piece into the stock fender (or fiberglass ones) to block the rubber, I've seen it somewhere some years back
http://www.internetbrands.com/ib800-692-2200
|
cluelessmale

Offline
1115 posts [100%]
PA
2-18-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (rota92) | « » 10:16 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
one less thing you need to have to be able to keep up with the big dogs
95 DC2 (Racecar) 11.889 -- 120.00mph 10psi (9s by 2010) 94 DC4 (Daily)Myspace
|
Jeff @ Tempest
Honda-Tech Sponsor

Offline
13643 posts [100%]
Tempest MD
7-10-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale) | « » 11:37 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by cluelessmale » | | one less thing you need to have to be able to keep up with the big dogs |
I wouldn't say that you would need this to keep up with anyone. I don't see any performance gain from this front end other than weight, but as long as there is weight minimums, that doesn't matter either. Just another stupid NHRA rule, It would have been cool to have this.
Tempest Racing Online StoreTempest Racing Home Page
|
Drag Race Inc

Offline
907 posts [100%]
Colorado Springs CO
9-7-2004
|
I don't understand what doesn't make it legal. It is two fenders, a hood, and a front bumper which is what all sportsman cars have. Just because the front fenders are flaired, what is the big deal?
Chris Dye Club RSX.com Drag Race Inc.com
|
miller
Honda-Tech Sponsor
Offline
10325 posts [100%]
long island ny
12-8-2001
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (cluelessmale) | « » 11:46 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
Thats bullshit, i dont understand why they will not allow this "body kit". If they dont allow these fenders and bumper then they should just make it mandatory to run stock fenders and bumper.
NRG tech racing inc 99a Bell St. West Babylon NY 11704631-243-6NRG Miller@NRGtechracing.com please visit our new online store.. http://www.NRGtechParts.com http://www.NRGtechRacing.com
|
Arturbo
Better with Steak. resident wiseacre

Offline
21297 posts [100%]
1-26-2000
My Gallery
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (miller) | « » 11:51 PM 8/23/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
I know some people that got that front end and they are pissed now!!
10.006@150mph T1 Race Development -Competition Clutch -Full-Race Motorsports "You must be the change you want to see in the world"-Mahatma Gandhi
|
RacerStev

Offline
900 posts [100%]
Elkinspark pa
1-29-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (BoostedJeff) | « » 12:04 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
An exposed tire creates shitloads of drag. From what I've read anyway....
Steve If no IM reply try RacerStev@Yahoo.com96 Neon Power Street for 08
|
philipwight
race-lines.com

Offline
599 posts [100%]
Fort Worth Tx.
7-7-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (RacerStev) | « » 12:15 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
this is an email from Pat at nhra tech dept just after the vegas race. i have purchased one and that was about the only thing that was keeping me from racing. i didnt make the indy race becasue of home purchase but was planning on it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >there is a commercially available front bumper and fender combo available >for the 1992-1995 Honda Civic. I just wanted to make sure that the set up >is legal for competition in sfwd. The civics do not have the same amount >of >room in front of the core support as an integra or even a 1996-2000 civic. >attached is a picture of the bumper and fenders on a car. it retaines the >factory apearing fenders just wider. The rule book is vauge and i dont >want >to travel to indy and not be able to race. > >Thanks for your time, >Philip Wight > Philip, > > Per the 2007 NHRA Sport Compact Rulebook page 31 under body it reads in >part "Mild customizing and body kits permitted, but must retain full bodied >appearance". With that said it would be legal to use the same fenders and >bumper as this car; as it was permitted to run this past weekend in Las >Vegas. > >Pat Cvengros > >Technical Services Representative > >(626) 250-2295 -----Original Message----- From: Philip Wight [mailto:philipwight@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:13 PM To: Pat Cvengros Subject: [Spam?] RE: [Spam?] sfwd bumper and fender question about legality. Is this considered written permission?
Thanks alot. Philip Philip,
Not exactly, if you want written permission send pictures of the fenders and bumper on your car, request approval. However I can tell you I see no problem with the car you are using as an example. Pat Cvengros Technical Services Representative (626) 250-2295
http://www.t1racedevelopment.com
|
miller
Honda-Tech Sponsor
Offline
10325 posts [100%]
long island ny
12-8-2001
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (philipwight) | « » 12:18 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
so wtf?
NRG tech racing inc 99a Bell St. West Babylon NY 11704631-243-6NRG Miller@NRGtechracing.com please visit our new online store.. http://www.NRGtechParts.com http://www.NRGtechRacing.com
|
philipwight
race-lines.com

Offline
599 posts [100%]
Fort Worth Tx.
7-7-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (philipwight) | « » 12:20 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
i dont know why it pisses me off but it does. i guess because i went through the trouble of emailing before the investment.with the way my i/c is mounted, that is the only bumper i have found to fit it. i guess we will see what looks better front end wise. i will have to dust off the chain saw.
http://www.t1racedevelopment.com
|
ls1_datsun

Offline
138 posts [100%]
phoenix az
7-25-2007
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (BoostedJeff) | « » 12:38 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by BoostedJeff » | I wouldn't say that you would need this to keep up with anyone. I don't see any performance gain from this front end other than weight, but as long as there is weight minimums, that doesn't matter either. Just another stupid NHRA rule, It would have been cool to have this. |
i hope your not serious... with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference.
|
fast2camciv

Offline
1160 posts [100%]
Nampa Idaho
1-29-2003
|
so technically you could bolt on a set of fender flares and be ok? isnt that the same thing? seems like a rediculous rule.
94 Integra GSR 4dr 11.1 @ 130 490whp Tunerzine.com Feature HERE!!GSR VictorX, 1000cc's, P28, ITR cam FOR SALE HERE!!
|
TheWickedOne

Offline
880 posts [97%]
CT
1-27-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (ls1_datsun) | « » 12:45 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by BoostedJeff » | Quote, originally posted by BoostedJeff » I wouldn't say that you would need this to keep up with anyone. I don't see any performance gain from this front end other than weight, but as long as there is weight minimums, that doesn't matter either.Just another stupid NHRA rule, It would have been cool to have this. |
| Quote, originally posted by ls1_datsun » | i hope your not serious... with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference. |
x2
•TurboStreet• 2007 9.70@156.81RLZENGINEering thefizix.com
|
Arturbo
Better with Steak. resident wiseacre

Offline
21297 posts [100%]
1-26-2000
My Gallery
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (ls1_datsun) | « » 1:18 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by ls1_datsun » | i hope your not serious... with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference. |
how so?
10.006@150mph T1 Race Development -Competition Clutch -Full-Race Motorsports "You must be the change you want to see in the world"-Mahatma Gandhi
|
Boner_Ben

Online
1897 posts [99%]
Reisterstown MD
9-12-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (ls1_datsun) | « » 5:19 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by ls1_datsun » | i hope your not serious... with the top cars going 155+ a front end like that will make a difference. |
Last time I checked the cars going 155+ are using stock body parts. I personally dont think a front end like that will make a difference but it is definitly neat looking. Looks to me like you pretty much have nhra's approval
94 Civic Hatch Bullseye S366XL/Tempest Tuned 10.34@145 so far.. -DOT tires/Nopi Powerstreet Trim 08 GSXR 750, 02 SVT Lightning Absolute Pro-Formance 410-861-8606
|
1992Si

Offline
2266 posts [100%]
Somers CT
8-22-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (Arturbo) | « » 6:42 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by Arturbo » | how so? |
IMO, with the slicks covered, the car will have better aero-dynamic's, less drag. With out the two holes (where the charge pipes are) again you have less drag. Doesn't less drag = more speed?
Earl, thanks for all you did for us, "all of us". You'll live on in our memories. No one could ever replace you. RIP AFAP Racing 1992 Yellow Civic Si best ET 9.85 @ 145.68MPH single cam, 1.54 60ft
|
TheWickedOne

Offline
880 posts [97%]
CT
1-27-2003
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (1992Si) | « » 8:17 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by 1992Si » | IMO, with the slicks covered, the car will have better aero-dynamic's, less drag. With out the two holes (where the charge pipes are) again you have less drag. Doesn't less drag = more speed? |
Looks as if the front bottom lip would benefit as well .. Of course, how do you quantify the gain in the aerodynamics, as well a little bit of downforce on the front.. Back to Back wind tunnel tests, slightly cut OEM vs the aftermarket.., it does look pretty dope though and theoretically.. there should be some type of gain.. I just can't say how much ..
Modified by TheWickedOne at 8:44 AM 8/24/2007
•TurboStreet• 2007 9.70@156.81RLZENGINEering thefizix.com
|
ATYPR

Offline
3603 posts [99%]
NC
5-8-2001
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (TheWickedOne) | « » 10:23 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
This front end is much safer than stock. @#%* the rules, I'm buying this front end for my street car.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLwhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=vAH3AeFy0SY "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest." -Mark Twain Ron Paul 08
|
tony1

Offline
12310 posts [101%]
Dallas TX
5-24-2002
|
| « Re: 3piece front not legal for SFWD (TheWickedOne) | « » 10:23 AM 8/24/2007 |
Reply
Edit
|
If any of you guys have actually looked at one of these cars with the right offset wheel at high speeds, you'll see that the tires don't stick out past the fenders. The tires grow and get skinny, at the speeds where aero comes into play, the tires are not sticking out past the fenders.This front end looks cool, no doubt, but it will more than likely slow the car down by having more frontal area that is not needed... Wider is not better for aero.
http://www.t1raceparts.com9.19 @ 164 9.27 @ 167
|
| | First 1 2 3 4 5 > Last |