Go Back   Honda-Tech >

Honda and Acura Technical Forums

> Forced Induction
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-2004, 06:27 PM   #1
boosted hybrid
Member
 
boosted hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,817
Default Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold

I finally got the AIR manifold installed this week. Fitment was rough, the fuel filter needed to be relocated, new IC piping fabricated, mounting of the remote IACV bracket, etc. Yesterday I finally got to test it. Here are the results:

Both at 10psi



Dotted line represents the Edelbrock, Solid lines represent the AIR manifold.

In a nutshell the manifold is amazing, and lives up to all the hype that was generated from it a year ago. It simply does not retain any heat. Back to back dyno runs, with ambient temperatures around 80 degrees in the dyno bay and the intake air temperatures (with the IAT probe mounted on the plenum) were around 85 degrees. The IM felt warm to the touch, but wasnt even close to being hot at all. I was able to move the vtec engagement point from 5,000rpm's to 4200rpm's, and gain 35-38 ft-lbs of torque in that area. This is due to the volumteric effieincy of the intake manifold being much greater at a lower rpm due to the longer runners. The air/fuel between the comparision was 12:1, and the timing maps were untouched. The car feels wickedly fast on the low end on the street, and the top end pull is much better (torque held better at high rpms).

*Note* the t3/t67 was switched out in favor of a gt3071. The best dyno results of the newer gt3071 with the edelbrock still installed was the run that the comparision graph is based upon. I lost peak power and top end pull by the turbo switch, but gained much more midrange (smaller turbo, quicker spool). With the AIR manifold installed the top end is once again the same as with the t3/t67.

Overall I am very happy with the intake manifold. To me the price was well worth it considering that it wont retain any heat during hot lapping situations my car will be experiencing while doing open track events (road racing).

Eluder200k made a ride along video right after getting it tuned:

http://cs.widener.edu/~epanek/Jeff%20Ridealong.mpg


Modified by boosted hybrid at 7:40 AM 9/22/2004
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Honda-Tech!
__________________
http://www.evans-tuning.com
boosted hybrid is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:31 PM   #2
Ri5e
Member
 
Ri5e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 7,254
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (boosted hybrid)

That's awesome! Any chances of getting a dyno of the AIR Manifold versus a sheet metal intake mani (STR/Venom) ?
__________________
1998 BMW Z3
1993 RX-7 LS1 V8 (Sold)
www.springfield-supercars.com
Ri5e is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:32 PM   #3
Irishweird00
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hypocrisy Capital of the World, New York
Posts: 3,981
Send a message via AIM to Irishweird00
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (BG Boost)

Thats the Carbon AIR manifold right?
Irishweird00 is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:37 PM   #4
B18Flip
Member
 
B18Flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Somewhere in, CT, USA
Posts: 3,892
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (Irishweird00)

good stuff jeff
__________________
Vouch http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=755388
99 Champ White DC2: recently broken into!
B18Flip is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:38 PM   #5
boosted hybrid
Member
 
boosted hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,817
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (BG Boost)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BG Boost
That's awesome! Any chances of getting a dyno of the AIR Manifold versus a sheet metal intake mani (STR/Venom) ?
Probably not. I dont have access to one, therefore I cannot test it. I would most likely need to fabricate new IC piping as well, which isnt a huge issue at all. The STR/Venom/GE manifolds will work about as well as the edelbrock cast piece.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishweird00
Thats the Carbon AIR manifold right? ?
Correct, its carbon fiber. AIR only makes the manifold in carbon fiber to my knowledge, they do have an all motor and forced induction version though. I am using the FI version. Check the video upclose shots of the manifold.



__________________
http://www.evans-tuning.com
boosted hybrid is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:44 PM   #6
boosted hybrid
Member
 
boosted hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,817
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (boosted hybrid)

Here are some pics of the edelbrock and the AIR pre-installed:










Modified by boosted hybrid at 7:41 AM 9/22/2004
__________________
http://www.evans-tuning.com
boosted hybrid is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:45 PM   #7
Irishweird00
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hypocrisy Capital of the World, New York
Posts: 3,981
Send a message via AIM to Irishweird00
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (boosted hybrid)

I'll be the first to say it.... YOUR NUTS....

I drove down that street if it's the one I'm thinking of.... and your crazy for driving that fast down it. I almost ripped my underbody off driving 40 through there.

crazy bastard jeff
Irishweird00 is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:54 PM   #8
Slick GS-R
Member
 
Slick GS-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,527
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (Irishweird00)

looks good jeff
__________________
06' G35 Coupe 6MT - Click this for more info: http://home.comcast.net/~pagano.anthony
00' Integra Type R
78' Corvette
Slick GS-R is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:54 PM   #9
B18Flip
Member
 
B18Flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Somewhere in, CT, USA
Posts: 3,892
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (Irishweird00)

are you going to dyno it against the manifold you made?
__________________
Vouch http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=755388
99 Champ White DC2: recently broken into!
B18Flip is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:59 PM   #10
boosted hybrid
Member
 
boosted hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,817
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (B18Flip)

Quote:
Originally Posted by B18Flip
are you going to dyno it against the manifold you made?
I would like to. Geoff at full race has it right now in AZ, so its not going to happen for awhile. My intake manifold vs edelbrock did the following:

Blue lines are my IM:
Red lines are the Edelbrock:



That comparison was with the t3/t67 turbo on my engine, and letting the engine cool down between runs. All things considered, I had to let my IM cool down between runs, whereas the AIR I didnt at all.


Modified by boosted hybrid at 7:42 AM 9/22/2004
__________________
http://www.evans-tuning.com
boosted hybrid is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 06:59 PM   #11
project dc2
H-T Basic Sponsor
 
project dc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 43257 Osgood Rd. Fremont, CA 94539
Posts: 42,731
Send a message via AIM to project dc2
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (boosted hybrid)

what happened to the one you made?
project dc2 is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 07:13 PM   #12
Full-Race Geoff
Member
 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FULL RACE, AZ, USA
Posts: 4,482
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (project dc2)

the manifold that jeff made is currently at our shop. I have 6 different intake manifolds here currently that i have been using for testing.

We are prototyping an aluminum manifold with CNC machined runners and a pretty aerodynamic high volume plenum. We're trying to keep this as affordable as possible, too.

The AIR is a beautifully mfg'd and designed manifold, but the prohibitive cost and the risk of cracking carbon (anyone who saw papadakis's old carbon intake manifold has probably seen the cracks and patches) will scare most people away.
Great test jeff!
Full-Race Geoff is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 07:19 PM   #13
GOLDBERG
Member
 
GOLDBERG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: phoenix, hawaii
Posts: 4,476
Send a message via AIM to GOLDBERG
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (Full-Race Geoff)

wow how much will yer manifolds be runnin cost wise?
__________________
my vouch thread: http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=963406
Quote:
Originally Posted by 96integraLS
b18c1 is ls.... you dont kno ur blocks... tisk tisk
*people are quick to turn down the information they dislike in favor of what they want to hear. *

GOLDBERG is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 07:28 PM   #14
AlphaMike
Junior Member
 
AlphaMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 595
Send a message via AIM to AlphaMike
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (GOLDBERG)

Great test Jeff Dude you're nuts flying up that road like that...LOL
AlphaMike is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:02 PM   #15
Ri5e
Member
 
Ri5e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 7,254
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (GOLDBERG)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOLDBERG
wow how much will yer manifolds be runnin cost wise?
I'd like to know too. I would love to own a Full-Race intake manifold that's designed for the forced induction camp
__________________
1998 BMW Z3
1993 RX-7 LS1 V8 (Sold)
www.springfield-supercars.com
Ri5e is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:14 PM   #16
Charles B.
Member
 
Charles B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,780
Send a message via AIM to Charles B.
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (BG Boost)

nice test and vid makes me wish i had roads like that around where i live.
__________________
1988 Mazda RX-7 (sold) ~ 1993 Honda Civic CX (sold) ~ 1991 Lexus LS400 (RIP) ~ 1989 Toyota Corolla (sold) ~ 1998 Toyota 4Runner Limited ~ 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR (RIP) ~ 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX GSR ~ 1989 Honda CRX Si
Charles B. is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:17 PM   #17
FlipSkater
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (boosted hybrid)

very cool i like to edelbrock vs venom
Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:24 PM   #18
Phil Koury
Junior Member
 
Phil Koury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 413
Send a message via AIM to Phil Koury
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (FlipSkater)

The car has an extremely sick powerband. Jeff was just partially on it today and we were going about 100mph before I could look up from the laptop and back again. The car pulls so crazy hard now its unbelievable...haha you guys think Jeff is crazy on that hill??

Awesome vid Evan
Phil Koury is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:34 PM   #19
Full-Race Geoff
Member
 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FULL RACE, AZ, USA
Posts: 4,482
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (pkoury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkoury

Awesome vid Evan
as usual, you have awesome skills sir!
Full-Race Geoff is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:36 PM   #20
TurboChrgd_Civic
Member
 
TurboChrgd_Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA, US
Posts: 4,400
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (pkoury)

Great comparison. The AIR manifold looks badass! How did it set you back???
__________________
Turbo Civic Si (Retired)
10.64 @ 141mph
638hp 457tq (gt35r)

TurboChrgd_Civic is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:40 PM   #21
TurboChrgd_Civic
Member
 
TurboChrgd_Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA, US
Posts: 4,400
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (TurboChrgd_Civic)

crazy ass video too! Was it raining?
__________________
Turbo Civic Si (Retired)
10.64 @ 141mph
638hp 457tq (gt35r)

TurboChrgd_Civic is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:44 PM   #22
done
Member
 
done's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: usa
Posts: 6,455
Default Re: Intake manifold comparison: Edelbrock vs. AIR manifold (Full-Race Geoff)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
the manifold that jeff made is currently at our shop. I have 6 different intake manifolds here currently that i have been using for testing.

We are prototyping an aluminum manifold with CNC machined runners and a pretty aerodynamic high volume plenum. We're trying to keep this as affordable as possible, too.

The AIR is a beautifully mfg'd and designed manifold, but the prohibitive cost and the risk of cracking carbon (anyone who saw papadakis's old carbon intake manifold has probably seen the cracks and patches) will scare most people away.
Great test jeff!
I have pictures of that manifold you speak off.. I saw it at nopi 3-4 years ago!!!

that AIR manifold freaking rocks if it can pick up low end power..

Before my car blew, my turbo was starting to spool around 3500 instead of 4200rpms.. and thats at t3/67. The car felt amazing on low end before it blew.
__________________
| Pneumatic VACUUM line Kit |
done is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:57 PM   #23
2point2
Member
 
2point2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 5,603
Default

wow. looks like you could have reved it higher for bigger numbers!?!?
__________________
Turbocharged CRX w/Stock H22
10.73 @ 137mph
Pics and Info
2point2 is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 09:13 PM   #24
Irishweird00
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hypocrisy Capital of the World, New York
Posts: 3,981
Send a message via AIM to Irishweird00
Default Re: (2point2)

those things go for around 900-1000 bucks don't they?
Irishweird00 is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 09:16 PM   #25
TurboJesse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (Irishweird00)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishweird00
those things go for around 900-1000 bucks don't they?
x2

Introductry price was ~1100-1200 but i think there like $1800 now.
Report Post   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
air, bay, edelbrock, engin, fabricate, gsr, honda, hondatech, iac, intake, manifold, metal, post, sheet, venom

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 AM.

Site Guidelines - Contact Us - Honda-Tech.com - Top


2008 Copyright, InternetBrands Inc.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for Honda-Tech.com content, comments, or advertising. Honda-Tech.com is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse Honda-Tech.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.