Go Back   Honda-Tech >

Honda and Acura Model Specific Forums

> Acura Integra
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2009, 02:21 AM   #1
NayborhoodJohnny
Junior Member
1992 Acura Integra
 
NayborhoodJohnny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Irvine, CA, USA
Posts: 34
Send a message via AIM to NayborhoodJohnny
Default 92 Integra DA - Alignment questions: control arms or tie rods?

my cars alignment is off at the moment. I bought new cv axles. My mechanic told me to buy new front lower control arms before i aligned. my trust in this mechanic is a 5 out of 10.

what do tie rods do? what do the lower control arms do? in which cases should i replace them? what other parts are linked to my cars alignment problems?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Honda-Tech!
NayborhoodJohnny is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 03:40 PM   #2
God-Driven
Junior Member
 
God-Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, Tx, u.s.a
Posts: 224
Default Re: 92 Integra DA - Alignment questions: control arms or tie rods?

all cars have inner and outher tie rods, the outher tie rod is connected to the inner and the inner is connected to the rack and pinion the TOE is adjusted with this two, he told you to replace the lower control arms cuz maybe theres play in the ball joint, the ball joint is pressed into the lower control arm and in some models it has to be replace with the entire control arm and its also a lot easier to do, if theres play in the ball joint this could affect the CAMBER in the car if so most likely the inside of your tires is wearing out way too fast, the CAMBER can not be adjusted from the factory in Integras you have to buy adjustable upper control arms but if there is play on the lower control arm just replace it and that should fix it.
God-Driven is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 05:01 PM   #3
Double Agent
Junior Member
1991 Acura Integra
My Garage
 
Double Agent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 126
Default Re: 92 Integra DA - Alignment questions: control arms or tie rods?

God-Driven hit the nail on the head. The only thing to add is that on a 92 Integra the lower ball joint is in the steering knuckle, not the lower control arm. The ball joint can be changed on DA Integras by removing the snap ring and hammering the ball joint out. Tap in a new ball joint and install a new snap ring and you are good to go.

Unless your lower control arms have become bent from an accident, etc., the only thing that can go wrong with them are the bushings. If the bushings are bad, it may be cheaper to replace the whole control arm rather than change the bushings, depending on labor prices.
__________________
Friends don't let friends drive Volkswagens.
Double Agent is offline Report Post   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2000, 92, accord, acura, alignment, arm, arms, bad, control, da, front, honda, integra, lower, replace, rod

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM.

Site Guidelines - Contact Us - Honda-Tech.com - Top


2008 Copyright, InternetBrands Inc.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for Honda-Tech.com content, comments, or advertising. Honda-Tech.com is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse Honda-Tech.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.