205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT.
12-14-2007, 09:33 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT.
Check this out! our tuners street car.
12.1:1 LS WITH JDM P73'S
BUSHED STOCK RODS WITH ARP BOLTS
PORTED B18A1 HEAD
CROWER 62404A CAMS
CROWER VALVETRAIN
SKUNK2 PRO SERIES INTAKE MANIFOLD
SKUNK2 PRO SERIES 68MM THROTTLE BODY
CUSTOM HEADER 1.75" TO 2" 4-2-1 2.5" COLLECTOR
2.75" ALUMINUM INTAKE PIPE 23" LONG
PUMP GAS 93 OCTANE
HONDATA S300
STOCK INJECTORS
WALBRO 255LPH FUEL PUMP
Dc 4-2-1 1.58" primary dia. 1.75" secondary dia. 2" collector
vs.
1.75" primary dia. 2" secondary dia. 4-2-1 custom header
12.1:1 LS WITH JDM P73'S
BUSHED STOCK RODS WITH ARP BOLTS
PORTED B18A1 HEAD
CROWER 62404A CAMS
CROWER VALVETRAIN
SKUNK2 PRO SERIES INTAKE MANIFOLD
SKUNK2 PRO SERIES 68MM THROTTLE BODY
CUSTOM HEADER 1.75" TO 2" 4-2-1 2.5" COLLECTOR
2.75" ALUMINUM INTAKE PIPE 23" LONG
PUMP GAS 93 OCTANE
HONDATA S300
STOCK INJECTORS
WALBRO 255LPH FUEL PUMP
Dc 4-2-1 1.58" primary dia. 1.75" secondary dia. 2" collector
vs.
1.75" primary dia. 2" secondary dia. 4-2-1 custom header
Last edited by BearsEK-KMSU; 08-03-2009 at 12:52 PM.
12-14-2007, 09:51 PM
#3
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: retired 2/13/10
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (BearsEK-Kingmotorsports)
id love to see the cars your associated on another dyno. 1.8L making 150+ft lbs is amazing. this dyno appears to read like its at the hubs.
12-14-2007, 09:53 PM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (1 2 NV)
It has nothing to do with the dyno i have already tested our dyno to the one at my old job (extreme parts). The drag car and my gf's car made exactly the same horsepower. b16 with stock internals usually make 145-155 whp intake header exhaust on our dyno and type R's are usually around 170 ish whp.
12-14-2007, 09:59 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (1 2 NV)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you know what im saying. your TQ numbers are always impressive.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats what happens when you dyno all the time and do your homework
Thats what happens when you dyno all the time and do your homework
12-14-2007, 10:05 PM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (1 2 NV)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you know what im saying. your TQ numbers are always impressive.</TD></TR></TABLE>
that 155tq. looks more like it's comming from a 2.0, don't u think? imo i could be wrong lol
that 155tq. looks more like it's comming from a 2.0, don't u think? imo i could be wrong lol
Trending Topics
12-14-2007, 10:12 PM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (b20vtech)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20vtech »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
that 155tq. looks more like it's comming from a 2.0, don't u think? imo i could be wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
I guess p73's came in 84 bore then? Actually it has 81.25mm bore pistons.
that 155tq. looks more like it's comming from a 2.0, don't u think? imo i could be wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
I guess p73's came in 84 bore then? Actually it has 81.25mm bore pistons.
12-14-2007, 10:22 PM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (BearsEK-Kingmotorsports)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BearsEK-Kingmotorsports »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I guess p73's came in 84 bore then? Actually it has 81.25mm bore pistons.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i know p73 comes in 81 and 81.25mm, but that torque is incredible for a little 1.8..
I guess p73's came in 84 bore then? Actually it has 81.25mm bore pistons.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i know p73 comes in 81 and 81.25mm, but that torque is incredible for a little 1.8..
12-14-2007, 10:30 PM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (b20vtech)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20vtech »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i know p73 comes in 81 and 81.25mm, but that torque is incredible for a little 1.8..</TD></TR></TABLE>
Just for reference here are some graphs.
Blue line B18a1 with 2.5 exhaust everything else stock
Green line Jdm type R intake Skunk2 exhaust
Red line LS with 404's
i know p73 comes in 81 and 81.25mm, but that torque is incredible for a little 1.8..</TD></TR></TABLE>
Just for reference here are some graphs.
Blue line B18a1 with 2.5 exhaust everything else stock
Green line Jdm type R intake Skunk2 exhaust
Red line LS with 404's
12-15-2007, 05:58 AM
#14
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: retired 2/13/10
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205 WHP LS GRAPH INSIDE Pump gas 93 OCT. (b20vtech)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20vtech »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
that 155tq. looks more like it's comming from a 2.0, don't u think? imo i could be wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah thats what i always think when i see a bears EK graph but hes like todd always got something impressive.
that 155tq. looks more like it's comming from a 2.0, don't u think? imo i could be wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah thats what i always think when i see a bears EK graph but hes like todd always got something impressive.
...Awesome!
12-15-2007, 07:37 AM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: (D-Rob)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D-Rob »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The powerband looks great.
I also believe this dyno reads a hair liberally.
- Derek</TD></TR></TABLE>
The really funny thing is the whole two dyno thing. All the graphs i have ever posted are from two different dyno's sometimes three. All of them dynojets, all 224x's but two with load control. Half of the drag car runs (275whp) at king before i worked here and i backed up the same numbers on the dynojet from my last job. Im glad we have a dyno jet because you can't fib the numbers!
Modified by BearsEK-Kingmotorsports at 8:40 AM 12/17/2007
I also believe this dyno reads a hair liberally.
- Derek</TD></TR></TABLE>
The really funny thing is the whole two dyno thing. All the graphs i have ever posted are from two different dyno's sometimes three. All of them dynojets, all 224x's but two with load control. Half of the drag car runs (275whp) at king before i worked here and i backed up the same numbers on the dynojet from my last job. Im glad we have a dyno jet because you can't fib the numbers!
Modified by BearsEK-Kingmotorsports at 8:40 AM 12/17/2007
12-15-2007, 07:54 AM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Re: (BearsEK-Kingmotorsports)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BearsEK-Kingmotorsports »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The really funny thing is the whole two dyno thing. All the graphs i have ever posted are from two different dyno's sometimes three. All of them dynojets, all 224x's but two with load control. Half of the drag car runs (275whp) at king before i worked here and i backed up the same numbers on the dynojet from my last job. Im glad we have a dyno jet becaust you can't fib the numbers!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then you must be doing some incredibly right!
Kudos.
- Derek
The really funny thing is the whole two dyno thing. All the graphs i have ever posted are from two different dyno's sometimes three. All of them dynojets, all 224x's but two with load control. Half of the drag car runs (275whp) at king before i worked here and i backed up the same numbers on the dynojet from my last job. Im glad we have a dyno jet becaust you can't fib the numbers!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then you must be doing some incredibly right!
Kudos.
- Derek
12-15-2007, 08:03 AM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toledo, Ohio, USA
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: (BearsEK-Kingmotorsports)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D-Rob »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The powerband looks great.
I also believe this dyno reads a hair liberally.
- Derek</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh... Here we go......IMO All Dynojets seam to read High but thats because we have a Mustang Dyne and am used to the numbers. But I know when I go to another Mustang Dyne our the numbers are going to be spot on (I Know because I have done it). Mike has done the same thing. I can also attest to the Fact that There dyno is calibrated properly. I have several DRF files that Mike has sent me from Various cars and 2 different 224 Machines.
I thing most of you are missing the amount of headwork and tuning that this engine has. This is there tuners car... what do you think is going to come from some one who tunes Honda's all day every day. You should learn from this and not question the expensive machine so much.
I also believe this dyno reads a hair liberally.
- Derek</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh... Here we go......IMO All Dynojets seam to read High but thats because we have a Mustang Dyne and am used to the numbers. But I know when I go to another Mustang Dyne our the numbers are going to be spot on (I Know because I have done it). Mike has done the same thing. I can also attest to the Fact that There dyno is calibrated properly. I have several DRF files that Mike has sent me from Various cars and 2 different 224 Machines.
I thing most of you are missing the amount of headwork and tuning that this engine has. This is there tuners car... what do you think is going to come from some one who tunes Honda's all day every day. You should learn from this and not question the expensive machine so much.
12-15-2007, 08:40 AM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New berlin, WI
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AussieGSR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AussieGSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You specify a b18a1 head, is there any diffence between that and a b1 head</TD></TR></TABLE>
The b18a head has way smaller ports than the b18b head. The ports in this head are pretty much like a b16, the valves are .5mm oversized. The I.D.'s of the valve seats are the same as a b16.
The b18a head has way smaller ports than the b18b head. The ports in this head are pretty much like a b16, the valves are .5mm oversized. The I.D.'s of the valve seats are the same as a b16.
12-15-2007, 08:46 AM
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (BearsEK-Kingmotorsports)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BearsEK-Kingmotorsports »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The b18a head has way smaller ports than the b18b head. The ports in this head are pretty much like a b16, the valves are .5mm oversized. The I.D.'s of the valve seats are the same as a b16.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So stock for stock, the b18b head flows better? I have a bunch of people intrested in this on another forum, they are wondering the difference as well.
So stock for stock, the b18b head flows better? I have a bunch of people intrested in this on another forum, they are wondering the difference as well.
mike you are my hero
