![]() |
|
|||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
|
| Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | My Recent Topics | My Notes | Used Cars | Garage | Vendor Directory |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Junior Member
|
__________________
hatin' jdm bandwagon geeks since 1999 DSDone BalleurBuilt |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
My advice to you is to call Scott Zellner at King Motorsports and ask him what he recommends.
__________________
2010 #31 CRX H4 Honda Challenge 2010 #37 Integra H4 Project Car AeroRD |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
95 accord LX - Daily Driver 90 Miata - Project where did all my post counts go? http://images.honda-tech.com/set1/smile/emsad.gif |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
be professional
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 13,910
|
So what "road racing" organization is this car competing with? What class?
Quote:
With that said, in a production car nothing is ideal, so you have to work around it. As mentioned, running a lot of static front camber and using extreme spring rates so that the suspension doesn't move much are the "solutions." Unfortunately, a car set up in this way does not lend itself very well to daily driving.
__________________
1991 Civic | 1998 CB750 | 2001 Integra | 2005 Giant Trance 2 | 2009 Redline Conquest Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Junior Member
2001 Acura Integra |
Quote:
__________________
Matt Lang- MLR Motorsports http://www.mlrmotorsports.com #99 SPEED World Challenge Skunk2, Gear-X, Moton, PIC, Synapse Motorsports, Wicked Tuning, P1 Spec, ASR, APR, Fastbrakes |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,106
|
Quote:
If you have ever looked or dealt with a TSX then you know the rear suspension isn't without issues either. I looked at one of the old davis cars this past weekend, and they were running exactly what davis had on the cars. Front Springs looked to be 700 or 800 lbs couldn't really tell. In the rear they were running 4100 lbs springs with a speedway eng bar, i couldn't tell the thickness though.
__________________
Check out my BLOGhttp://thenextenth.wordpress.com/ Thanks to.. www.motowear.com www.prima-racing.com www.hasport.comwww.redzoneperformance.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,106
|
Quote:
No one else believed me either, so they all went and looked. 5 inch 2.25 inch diameter and 4100lbs springs. Real time got to just about those rates IIRC before they changed mounting points.
__________________
Check out my BLOGhttp://thenextenth.wordpress.com/ Thanks to.. www.motowear.com www.prima-racing.com www.hasport.comwww.redzoneperformance.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
hoooooly moooooly.
5" length and 4100lbs/in, how much travel did they have between each coil before binding?? |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,106
|
Quote:
IMO the rear suspension with those rates, and that rear bar. There isn't much compression travel at the rear. I had seen the RTR RSX's running 3200lbs 3 years ago i think. Another RSX this past weekend was running springs between 3000 and 3500
__________________
Check out my BLOGhttp://thenextenth.wordpress.com/ Thanks to.. www.motowear.com www.prima-racing.com www.hasport.comwww.redzoneperformance.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
be professional
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 13,910
|
Quote:
Spring rate alone doesn't tell you much. Wheel rate is a much more useful calculation.
__________________
1991 Civic | 1998 CB750 | 2001 Integra | 2005 Giant Trance 2 | 2009 Redline Conquest Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
`
|
Is BMW's front suspension very different from this?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: OH
Posts: 9,236
|
Yep, most all of the competition RSX's run a rear springrate well over 2500lbs. Motion ratio is ~ 0.5:1, but if you allow the rear suspension to travel a great deal you'll get shock binding issues. So most folks just run them stiff as hell for those 2 reasons.
Also, camber is always near 0 in the rear. FWIW I believe the Spoon RSX (DC5 Integra) was running almost 6 degrees of static camber in the front. But, if you are looking to make a decent HPDE car, get a good coilover setup that addresses a few of these issues (note: Megan is not a good coilover). Look for a front tierod attachment that has been altered to fix the angle, and look for rear shocks that have good quality poly bushings in them, because this is where the bind is. For springrates, I'd start out with 500ft /1000rear with a big swaybar. You can daily drive this setup and it will be decent for an HPDE/autox. Key is keeping the rear spring twice that of the front. Race teams do it more than 4x the front. For camber I'd do ~ 2.2 static front and .5 rear. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I don't like you.
2001 Honda S2000 |
Quote:
btw when i was watching the race a couple weeks back on the speed channel, they said that the advantage to running the rsx as opposed to the tsx was its shorter wheel base.
__________________
FS: 2001 Honda S2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
95 accord LX - Daily Driver 90 Miata - Project where did all my post counts go? http://images.honda-tech.com/set1/smile/emsad.gif |
||
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Junior Member
|
any brands you would recommend? for a setup
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 26
|
This might sound to some as newbie question, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to change from MacPherson struts to Double Wishbone on the DC5??
If so, what is required? Can anyone fill me in a bit more about the issue? |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: www.edomoto.com
Posts: 5,839
|
You'd have to re-engineer the design pretty much. Anything is possible I guess. I much rather start off with a better car istead of trying to re-design something unless you must have a DC5, then spend away. A DC2 has the double wish bone already and it's a lot lighter.
4100lb rear springs? Yikes, they pretty much bitch slapped that rear suspension and told it to stay where it is or else. That's not moving anywhere. Great thread btw, I had no idea those TSXs varied their front to rear spring rates by 4x as much! You also see the rear raised up quite high on those, yet another trick to get it to rotate. Just to warn you, 1000lb rear springs are going to be quite a ride as a daily driver. I had 400lb and 500lb springs on the rear daily for awhile and those weren't comfortable at all. Nice on the track though.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by 1200 Hobos; 09-18-2009 at 10:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Culver City, CA, United States
Posts: 4,906
|
Quote:
The MR of 0.5:1 makes that 1,000 lbs/in spring a 250 lbs/in wheel rate, which is only marginally stiffer than the 400 lbs/in rear spring (220 wheel rate) I run on my daily driven DC2. 250 lbs/in of wheel rate sound perfectly streetable to me. This is why it is useless to just compare spring rates between different cars. We should compare the wheel rates between similarly weighted cars to get any meaningful comparison, as identical wheel rates with a large static weight difference mean radically different suspension natural frequencies... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Newark, DE, U.S.
Posts: 39
|
This is quite a well informed thread. I had figured out the motion ratio/ spring rate issue for my suspension re-design on my EP3 from reading what was out there about realtime and the problems of the mac-strut front suspension front and bad motion ratio rear on the car. Ended up going 550lbs front and 1100 rear w/ revalved koni's, (-3.5 front camber, -.75 rear. Increased castor with swaped camber plates and offset bushings in DC5-R aluminum control arms) Again I'm not going to be a competitive car by any means just trying to have fun on the track and local autocross (after all i have a k20a3 so...yea not going anywhere fast)
For the couple of guys that asked questions about coilovers i would stay away from almost any prebuilt setup. That being said if you really don't have the need to go custom ground control/koni set up Buddy Club Racing Spec gets the ratios a little better then most for the DC5 with 10k/mm front 16k/mm rear but who knows the quality of the springs and shocks are a little suspect. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: www.edomoto.com
Posts: 5,839
|
Do you daily drive your EP set-up the way it is with the 1100ft/lb springs in the back? Is it bearable?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Junior Member
|
in for info on this thread too. My 08 Civic si needs coilovers. Looking at custom ASTs or going with, dare I say, the underated Tein Monoflex which is an inverted strut front and can run up 12K front springs and 14K rears no problem. I would probably challenge them in the rear to run 16K though as the dude with the EP is stating above and run the given 10K springs front.
Currently running OEM suspension on drop springs with plenty of body roll with a 22mm RSBm 245 Dunlop star specs, -2.9 camber front and -2.6 rear (b/c of 245 tire clearance) OEM bushings everywhere.. . I do well, car turns in nicely but as usual for a FWD, it pushes at the limit. Placed 16th out of 97 drivers at my last AutoX in Arizona the other weekend. not bad for a car with no power mods or aft shocks and a driver with only 12 AutoXs and 8 HPDE days under his belt. Hopefully coilovers will allow me to be more smooth and I can move up the ranks even more.
__________________
New ride = 08 Civic Si cpe old ride = 95 Civic cpe K20a2 swapped track whore. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 50, autocross, bad, dc5, ends, moton, rod, rsx, ruckus, setup, suspension, tie |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|