![]() |
|
|||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
|
| Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | My Recent Topics | My Notes | Used Cars | Garage | Vendor Directory |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 685
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
yeah its not what most expect...the power just isnt there untill 9k...its a nice mod though
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio, usa
Posts: 1,979
|
its a focking 4 banger DUDE! it was not put on this world to be a dyno queen like your other cars. A SC'd s2k with an outta the box Comptech kit is 300hp, what are you smoking? what more do you want ?
I have chased down and beat several stock turbo supras and rx7s in a SC s2k. your dude must drive like a puss.
__________________
98- Hatchback- Race Car 01- S2000-toy 08- Acura RDX-daily 07- Tahoe LTZ- weekend hoe taxi |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: OC, CA, Vietnam
Posts: 52
|
He wants more area under the torque curve, which isn't gonna happen.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
OCD ISN'T A DISEASE, IT'S A LIFESTYLE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: los angeles, ca, us
Posts: 211
|
have one of you guys ever changed your final gear, if what was the difference?
__________________
S 2 K |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
the problem with the superchargers availible for our cars is that they are centrifugal.... the good thing about that is that it's utilizes an aftercooler or in some cases an intercooler to chill the air charge..... however.. you don't hit full boost till redline.... and the power curve is very linear similar to an NA car.....
you're coming from cars that have turbo chargers.... where when boost kicks in you feel the jerk and you take off.... so of course the feel of the supercharged S would feel slow cause you don't get that jerking feeling when you stomp on it....however.... the car only weighs 2800lbs or so...... with 300rwhp... you can easily take out most of the cars out there... and if you happen to truely modify it and hit the 400rwhp mark with the supercharger you can pretty much beat anything on the streets..... but if you like the head jerking feeling that you get from cars with massive torque.. then turbo is the way to go on the S.... |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
i want to get the new 4.56's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio, usa
Posts: 1,979
|
Quote:
ive been in a few AP1s that slammed my head back when i hit vtec at 5000rpm and ripped til 9k.
__________________
98- Hatchback- Race Car 01- S2000-toy 08- Acura RDX-daily 07- Tahoe LTZ- weekend hoe taxi |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 685
|
thank you.. i understand the dynamics of FI. I simply was let down from all the hype i've been reading about. Everyone on the damn internet forums, talks about SC'ing so much. I just don't see the big deal, at least yet.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Torrance 310, California, USA
Posts: 9,052
|
just wondering if the car you rode in was tuned or not? I rode in a s/c car before it got tuned and it didn't feel any different from my stock s2k...of course while i was getting the ride I played it off like it was quick...the driver even knew it wasn't that fast. he said that after he got it tuned it was a night and day difference. I still haven't been able to get a ride in it since...so can't say if it is different or not. but that may be a reason on why you weren't happy
__________________
TW: MUGEN NR-10's 13" New Tires |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
|
The powerband in the a s/c S is very smooth and decieving. My g/f has an S to and when she first drove mine, she didnt think it was that big of deal. I ran her from a roll and pulled 5 cars on her from 2nd to beggining of 4th. The powers there, I agree its lacking the torque so its a different feel to a turbo Supra or RX7.
__________________
05 GPW S2000, 7 psi |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
but like all will agree, the torque plays a big factor... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
yea i can see where the thread starter is comming from, my S is sc'd. Before my S i owned a ls/vtec 2.0L turbo integra pushing 300whp and 245tq. Now compared to how my S feels compared to my integra, big difference. Even though its similiar hp #'s, the power deliever was very different. But the S with a SC kit is still fairly nice, just not as nice a turbo. At least its smog legal
__________________
Ls obdII ecu 4 sale http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=647916 96 Ls/vtec 2.0L turbo (sold) 03 s2k (new toy) s2ki SN= VADER |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
EFSS153 My Garage Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 14,163
|
I don't think I could be disappointed from a 300rwhp bolt on kit in a 2800lb car.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
well u gotta see the power under the curve
__________________
Ls obdII ecu 4 sale http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=647916 96 Ls/vtec 2.0L turbo (sold) 03 s2k (new toy) s2ki SN= VADER |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
|
I still think a S/C S2k is a good investment, like everyone say the power band is just like NA. With some rick's 4.56 gears in the Ap2 s/c that shit will rip! I tell you that right now.
Tell your buddy to get a good clutch and take the clutch delay out and do get some gears! OH yeah if you want torque, wait until the BRP Root blower comes out on the S2k. Then my friend you'll feel the jerk neck snapping. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
^^^that is my setup for this Christmas....I have already got the comptech s/c and 4.56 gears ready for install this christmas...I'll chime back with my feedback when I'm done breaking the gears in....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
|
NIce! that is a really simple set up but yet I feel it will be effective. There a video on streetfire.net where a S2k + I/h/E + 4.56 gear vs a SRT + lots of bolts on. They ran on the fwy and the SRT couldn't shake him until 90-100mph. I think that's pertty damn good.
here the video of it. Click to see Video |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
|
I have to say that i thought the sc would be dumb and pointless on the S, liking the idea of itb's. but I drove my buddies S with the comptech/aftercooled with the veilside exhaust. Mybe it was the deafening exhaust and the sound of the sc but it felt alot faster than my stock ap1. in vtec my head was thown back so it was better than expected.I also has a stage 3 exedy clutch.
__________________
cars: 91' crx dx - project RHD 91' civic lx - turbo winter beater |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
|
hey, did you ride in the white supercharged ap2 at the fusion thing on sunday? you came late right? in the belina with carbon fiber hardtop? well if that was you, i was in the all stock nfr. did the guy say if it was tuned or not?
__________________
Phaze2 FTMFW My S2000 For sale http://www.hondamarketplace.com/show....php?t=2537880 |
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
i agree.... his car would pull harder if he'd scrap those le37's and give them to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Junior Member
|
I guess people still dont get it.. If you want a super fast drag car just get a hatch build the motor for boost there you go. I have a friend making 300whp with the vortech kit, its not a beast but its definatly not slow. And as for tourque, get over the fact that its a honda and the rod stroke ratio on our motors will always be set up for highreving making it hard to make crazy tq numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio, usa
Posts: 1,979
|
amen
__________________
98- Hatchback- Race Car 01- S2000-toy 08- Acura RDX-daily 07- Tahoe LTZ- weekend hoe taxi |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|